Back in 2005 when Joy and I were getting ready to move out here, my brother told me about a report he heard on NPR about 'fire season' in Southern California and how for several months of the year, the conditions are ripe for brush/forest fires. We thought it sounded kind of like how we have hurricane season (June 30-Nov 1) along the eastern seaboard.
So now, having experienced (one of) the worst fire seasons in SD, I figured I would draw some comparisons/contrasts. I hardly consider myself an expert in either fires or hurricanes, but I have had real experience with both now...
Similarities:
- Evacuations for multitudes of peoples and everything that comes with it (shelters, fully booked hotels, decisions on whether to stay/leave, which direction to head)
- 24 hour coverage of the situation on all the local stations
- Mass destruction
- Wondering when to go back
Differences:
- Advance warning (you know a hurricane's a'comin')
- Much less predictable nature of fires
- FIRE vs. water
There's more, I'm sure, but I guess I noticed the similarities more. (With a big exception being FIRE, which I'm mortally afraid of, versus people here, who seem to be mortally afraid of ANY precipitation and drive as if they're trying to get away from it!

) Anyway, they opened up Qualcomm Stadium (home of the reigning
Super Bowl AFC, er, West Champs!) as an evacuation shelters with people setting up tents outside and around the concourses. There's been a huge outpouring of relief from residents of San Diego, which has been tremendously helpful for the evacuees. It's really been great to hear about how they've had to turn away aid because they simply have too much.
And here's where I must degenerate into another minirant™. Local TV and radio people and residents calling/writing into local shows are starting to compare the situation here to 2003 New Orleans and Katrina. Some have been subtle, some have been outright disgraceful. I've heard things like "It's so great to see how San Diegans have united..." or "Qualcomm is like the Ritz of evacuee camps". Great that's the case, but do you realize WHY it's so different? True, half the city has evacuated, but the other half is still HERE. People that fled to the Superdome went as a last resort to survive and it wasn't like the other half of the city was around to bring aid nor was there means for people from outside of NO to bring it! Also, NO unfortunately does have deeply rooted racial issues which Katrina unfortunately brought to the forefront and magnified. Please don't say "San Diegans" vs. "New Orlineans" when you mean "white people" vs. "black people". Another person was applauding the city/county/state (not sure which) council for waiving building permits for people that want to rebuild (I agree!) but went so far as to say "This isn't New Orleans - people
want to return to San Diego." Um, duh! Why would people (who are for the most part much wealthier than the average New Orlinean) leave their 'perfect' sunny and 70s all year 'round SD? And do you not realize that a lot of people (who didn't want to leave in the first place)
want(ed) to return to New Orleans, but are unable, whether it's because they're too poor or they're literally unable to?
Ugh. I could go on, but it's pointless. I love San Diego and I'm saddened (and quite honestly, a bit frightened!) by everything that's happened this past week. But please don't pile on New Orleans. Enough has been said and hopefully plenty of lessons were learned (maybe even some that helped SD), but apparently some people weren't paying attention.